bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 81GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Microsoft Virtual Machine
Memory	26 GB free of 81 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121126
Uptime	9.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '18 at 12:23
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4620 v2 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% None, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.3% Average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 124 40% 73.8 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 531 47% 398 Pts	64-Core 1,033 64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 136GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 86GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 165 177 153 155 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 332 Write 182 Mixed 367 SusWrite 167 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 17.6 60% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 263 188% 247 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 79%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 161GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 24 27 24 23 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 51% Great: 72%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 397GB 97GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 58 59 45 64 98 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.2% Below average	Read 52.2 Write 35.7 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 73.9 32% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 0.83 MB/s

Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 161GB 51GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 24 27 24 23 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.7% Good	Read 187 Write 141 Mixed 100 SusWrite 26.4 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 2.4 477% 3 MB/s

Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 107GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 51GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 24 27 24 23 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 85%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 537GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 144GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 24 27 24 23 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 86.8 Write 75.5 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 26.4 42% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.4 322% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 81GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 3968, 32767, 4737, 23422, 18050 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 8.1 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 2 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16