Asus T300FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus T300FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T300FA
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141127
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 04 '18 at 16:36
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y10
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 104
45% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 145
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
Asus(1043 15FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.88
Parallax 3.72
2% 3.47 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.96
4% 4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk i110 64GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: i221000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 145 171 175 177 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 351
Write 181
Mixed 158
SusWrite 161
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 8.7
33% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 17.2
14% 21 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35%
Great: 39%
HGST HTS 541010A7E630 1TB
931GB free, PID 1810
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 106
114% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical T300FA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus T300FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback