Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131023
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '18 at 17:17
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 84.1 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 146 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 286 30% 241 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.1% Average	Lighting 49.1 Reflection 46.1 Parallax 73.6 40% 56.3 fps	MRender 48.3 Gravity 49.1 Splatting 49.3 40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 118GB 1,345 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 16GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 77 76 72 50 46 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.8% Below average	Read 201 Write 146 Mixed 142 SusWrite 76.9 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 16.2 65% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 28.3 DQ Mixed 12.1 13% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 73 84 83 107 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 124 Write 114 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 92.3 65% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 111% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 107%
Samsung HD502HM 500GB 813 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 286GB free Firmware: 1AJ10201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 81 83 81 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 72.7 Write 24.8 Mixed 40 SusWrite 81.7 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 79%
ASMT 2115 3TB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 216GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 111 112 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 124 Write 138 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 112 153% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 72%
ST932032 0AS 320GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 66GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 26.5 Mixed 21 SusWrite 18.9 32% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 18%
Samsung S2 Portable 320GB 1,030 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 86GB free, PID 1f03 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 20.5 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 19 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB 2,942 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.1 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	871x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	596x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	356x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	375x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	255x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	182x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	172x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	98x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16