Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9SRL-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9SRL-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRL-F
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 15:33
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 153
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 473
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 40.7
40% 45.3 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 424 412 424 430 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 407
Mixed 396
SusWrite 429
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 40.7
138% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 358
268% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$47
205GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 157 157 171 163 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 351
Write 326
Mixed 278
SusWrite 161
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 35
113% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 188
160% 235 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 107%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
804GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 128 139 133 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 364
Write 354
Mixed 339
SusWrite 132
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 33.1
106% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 269
197% 256 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB
728GB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 112 115 91 105 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 104%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
346GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 132 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 156
Write 145
Mixed 76
SusWrite 132
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 175 177 176 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 160
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 175
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRL-F Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRL-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback