HP ZBook 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1909
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateJun 13 '16 at 13:10
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 112
2-Core 203
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 328
35% 279 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
HP(103C 1909) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
7.42% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 8
Parallax 10
7% 8.87 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 8.73
Splatting 9.96
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M500_2.5"_7mm_960GB 960GB
407GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 417
Mixed 275
87% 394 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 26.4
120% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 42.6
87% 173 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 11.7
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback