Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 196 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 305 44% 323 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Zotac(19DA 1308) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	5.28% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 7.08 Parallax 7.44 5% 6.99 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 7.17 Splatting 7.26 5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.28% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geil Zenith S3 240GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.20 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	53.1% Above average	Read 356 Write 229 Mixed 236 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 12.1 80% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 52.6 DQ Mixed 11.1 16% 28 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 293GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	60.5% Good	Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 80.1 72% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.33 88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 1x8GB 2,292 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 51%, 607 samples	7x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $410