Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-M WS (all builds)
Memory	16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150831
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '18 at 09:46
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 166 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 611 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 792 49% 792 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 115 Parallax 99.1 85% 106 fps	MRender 95.9 Gravity 97.9 Splatting 93.4 78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 172 37 18 27 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 351 Write 211 Mixed 243 SusWrite 84.1 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 9.8 32% 10 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 24.4 101% 225 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 134%
PNY CS1311 960GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 94GB free Firmware: 1122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 347 305 261 183 271 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 387 Write 340 Mixed 270 SusWrite 284 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 9.7 32% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 194 180% 277 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C10 4x8GB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 42.9 MC Mixed 39.8 116% 40.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 15.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	23x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	17x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M393A1G40DB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 99%, 225 samples	7x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	6x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $452

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16