Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H77 Pro4/MVP  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 13:31
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 508
51% 413 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 67.5
58% 72.4 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 70
57% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft 가상 디스크 43GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 6.3 1.5 9.5 1.9 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 364
Write 33.8
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 10.1
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 5.6
16% 5.6 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 74.8
66% 102 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 77%
Toshiba HG6 128GB
24GB free
Firmware: JURA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 6.9 1.6 9.6 1.9 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 349
Write 59.5
Mixed 115
SusWrite 10.3
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 28.4
51% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 43.2
DQ Mixed 85.2
92% 163 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 153 162 161 161 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 154
Write 155
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 160
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77 Pro4/MVP Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP - $164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback