Today's hottest deals

MSI Z270 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A75)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A75
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A75)  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 19:42
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 231
89% 154 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 642
62% 510 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 32.5
29% 31.5 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 32.7
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 28%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A75) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Lighting 7.97
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 8.06
6% 9.14 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 16.1
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 523 521 518 510 510 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,753
Write 1,556
Mixed 727
SusWrite 536
254% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 54.9
196% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 773
DQ Mixed 811
620% 841 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 201%
Great: 254%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 512GB
315GB free
Firmware: HTRAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 452 451 426 441 443 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 230
Mixed 417
SusWrite 431
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 43.7
148% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 345
256% 338 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
291GB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 63 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 59.5
Write 88
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 70.3
16% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 3.23 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 7.1
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 18%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0511
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 61 42 41 41 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 128
Write 30.2
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 48.5
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 29
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 20.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A75) Builds (Compare 2,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A75)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback