Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170818
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 06:58
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 539
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 39.6
26% 34.8 fps
MRender 31.6
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 35.4
27% 32.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 188 188 198 199 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 510
Write 461
Mixed 434
SusWrite 218
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 48.1
159% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.8
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 48
39% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
1GB free
Firmware: HP34
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 69.7
Mixed 38.6
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.3
150% 2 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
13GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 101 92 107 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 88.5
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 104
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 64%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
11GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 100 102 102 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63% Good
Read 118
Write 121
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 102
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
23GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 29.7
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 36.8
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]199[F/T] Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 24.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback