ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PH517-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Cayman_CFS
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181024
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '18 at 07:06
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-8950HK 14,729 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 91.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 221 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 817 81% 663 Pts	64-Core 1,071 66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.1% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 36.9 Parallax 25.6 28% 32.5 fps	MRender 9.48 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 32.8 22% 25 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFS512GD9MNE-620 512GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 173% 289GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1265 1286 1312 1299 1299 1217 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 1,543 Write 1,331 Mixed 927 SusWrite 1,280 285% 1,270 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 94.7 4K Mixed 52.5 176% 62.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,062 DQ Write 651 DQ Mixed 617 524% 776 MB/s
Poor: 129% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 233%
Lacie P9220 2TB 334 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1053 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 109 109 109 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 106 Write 75.5 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 109 65% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.9 210% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 2x16GB 762 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 26.8 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 27.5 78% 27.3 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	430x
Core i9-8950HKIntelBench 74%, 14,729 samples	153x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	584x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x

SSD
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GBBench 190%, 1,347 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	40x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	39x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	131x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	110x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback