HP 810-303no

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 810-303no (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140912
Uptime	7.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '18 at 12:55
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 107 2-Core 203 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 565 58% 466 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78% Very good	Lighting 97.3 Reflection 103 Parallax 97.4 79% 99.2 fps	MRender 93.1 Gravity 88.5 Splatting 94.3 76% 92 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 429 Write 424 Mixed 339 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 48.4 164% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 349 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Sandisk SDSA6DM-016G-1006 16GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 15GB free Firmware: U221006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 244 Write 50.5 Mixed 60 SusWrite 50.3 22% 101 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 10 45% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 11.2 DQ Mixed 13.5 12% 17.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 28%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 79GB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 115 119 130 124 122 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 209 Write 178 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 120 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 112%
Seagate ST1000DM003-1CH162 2TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 468GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 140 141 139 140 143 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 168 Write 167 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 140 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 16.3 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-303no Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: HP 810-303no

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GBUnknownBench 60%, 29 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $235

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16