Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '18 at 19:40
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 56% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 51.9 2-Core 103 52% 80.2 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 307 32% 256 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 81.5 52% 71.7 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 62.6 Splatting 55.5 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105 6,748 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 764GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100WD SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 385 Write 370 Mixed 218 SusWrite 222 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 37.2 125% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.5 DQ Write 99.6 DQ Mixed 42.2 39% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 108%
WD WD30EZRZ-00Z 2TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 125 128 125 127 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 180 Write 158 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 127 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 73%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Z5B1 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 672GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 25.3 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 14.4 30% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 21%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 25.3 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 14.5 30% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 132% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 74%
Intenso Alu Line 4GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	2.73% Terrible	Read 9.7 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 4.1 6% 5.45 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 20,667 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.8% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 11.6 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $519

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16