bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2116 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '18 at 03:49
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100B
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 202
64% 120 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 131
21% 150 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.16.1.1
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 3.28
3% 3.69 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 6.65
4% 4.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,050
Write 1,719
Mixed 1,494
390% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 54.4
170% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 90.9
68% 90.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 88%
KINGSTON SUV400S3724 240GB
214GB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 82 105 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
Read 25.2
Write 47.6
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 65.3
61% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 6
424% 5.47 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB 1x2GB
1 of 128 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 7.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 2.8
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback