HP 810-170st

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 810-170st (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2ACE
Memory	15 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141106
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '18 at 18:47
Run Duration	335 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$90 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 187 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 538 58% 459 Pts	64-Core 724 45% 724 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit) 10,656 User benchmarks, average bench 20% HP(103C 6892) 1.5GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 30.1 19% 26 fps	MRender 32.9 Gravity 28.5 Splatting 22.3 22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 241GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,508 Write 4,204 Mixed 4,187 960% 4,300 MB/s	4K Read 355 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 184 856% 231 MB/s	DQ Read 803 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 405 347% 523 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 97GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 193 193 192 183 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 398 Write 187 Mixed 218 SusWrite 187 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 14.6 99% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 30 46% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 70%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 100GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 234 224 214 210 198 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	73.8% Very good	Read 248 Write 237 Mixed 224 SusWrite 220 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 39.9 134% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 155 128% 183 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 118%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 500GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 82GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 26 24 25 25 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 69.3 Write 29.2 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 25.7 30% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 65%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 6TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 894GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 25 26 24 28 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 123 Write 116 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 26 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 263% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 107%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 6TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 894GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 25 26 24 28 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 122 Write 118 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 26 63% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 386% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 67%
Lexar WorkflowD512 512GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 201GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 109 108 108 110 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 24%
WDC WD10 03FBYX-01Y7B0 1TB 520GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 63 64 64 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.9% Below average	Read 115 Write 114 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 62.3 117% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.63 MB/s

WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 937GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 32 32 32 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 120 Write 101 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 32.3 99% 79 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 937GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 29 32 32 32 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 108 Write 106 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 32.3 99% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 48%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.3 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 124 Write 118 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 2 82% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 49%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.1 0 0.3 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 134 Write 99 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 2 90% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.4 240% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 6,467 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 31.6 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-170st Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: HP 810-170st

CPU
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	15x
Core i7-4960XIntel $1,189Bench 78%, 5,121 samples	5x
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	4x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	3x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	5x
Raid 0 Volume 4TBIntelBench 427%, 1,660 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,248 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	4x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $389

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16