Alienware Aurora R11

Performance Results


Gaming 174% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 193% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Alienware Aurora R11 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 0N43JM
Memory	22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210302
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '21 at 17:19
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$255 21,040 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Memory 89.4 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 98% 181 Pts	4-Core 577 8-Core 1,153 102% 865 Pts	64-Core 2,042 126% 2,042 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Dell(1028 3880) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	179% Outstanding	Lighting 257 Reflection 242 Parallax 243 210% 247 fps	MRender 290 Gravity 221 Splatting 167 178% 226 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsu 1TB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 280% 759GB free (System drive) Firmware: 36303029 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1977 1993 1975 1800 1784 1805 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 1,429 Write 2,266 Mixed 1,688 SusWrite 1,889 413% 1,818 MB/s	4K Read 59.7 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 75.7 243% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 881 DQ Write 690 DQ Mixed 776 583% 782 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 370%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 189GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 401 Write 273 Mixed 281 SusWrite 58 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 27.2 88% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 94.1 DQ Write 95.3 DQ Mixed 103 75% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 124%
SABRENT 1TB 2,168 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 122GB free Firmware: 0208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 362 362 362 362 361 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 87%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$43 436 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 180GB free, PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 233 221 220 220 220 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 122%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72 6,221 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 117 151 162 171 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 251 Write 19.2 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 143 124% 114 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 8.1 648% 9.73 MB/s	DQ Read 10.8 DQ Write 9.4 DQ Mixed 8.5 649% 9.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 111%
H/W RAID 10 8TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 705GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 186 193 195 191 194 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 109 Write 214 Mixed 68 SusWrite 192 209% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 85%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 609GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 41.3 Write 42.5 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 37.8 53% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.7 248% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 74%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 834GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 41.2 Write 42.6 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 4.7 39% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.8 252% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 334GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 39.8 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 21 44% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 37%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 243GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 41.3 Write 42 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 21 46% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown XN205T-MIE2 2x16GB 2,127 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.4% Excellent	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 24.9 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 25.8 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	170	27"	1280 720	AUS2705 VG27AQL1A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aurora R11 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 171%

UFO

Desktop 97%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 167%

UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R11

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	419x
Core i9-10900KFIntel $255Bench 99%, 21,040 samples	235x
Core i7-10700KFIntel $200Bench 96%, 37,394 samples	219x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	297x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	184x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	163x

SSD
SN730 NVMe WDC 1024GBPCBench 229%, 3,901 samples	69x
NVMe SK hynix 1TBPc611Bench 201%, 6,137 samples	60x
NVMe KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 211%, 4,018 samples	54x

RAM
XW21KG-MIE2 2x8GBUnknownBench 84%, 2,787 samples	199x
XN205T-MIE2 2x16GBUnknownBench 96%, 2,127 samples	185x
XJ69DF-MIE2 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 2,320 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,079

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16