Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 22:36
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 43.8
40% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 128
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 370
Nvidia(10DE 0491) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.22
1% 0.82 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 95 16 22 21 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 314
Write 174
Mixed 158
SusWrite 47.3
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 14.2
50% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 33.5
42% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 108%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB
6GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.9 8.5 9.4 5.8 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 4
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 8.2
7% 5.47 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
10% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 9%
ST332082 0AS 320GB
189GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 21 21 19 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 15.5
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 20.1
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR8GU16H5128-33 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback