Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 85 1-Core 72.7 2-Core 106 57% 88 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 178 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 15F2) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2291 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 1.5 0% 1.71 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.17 2% 2.82 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 82 82 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 50.7 Write 85.1 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 82.8 45% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 8GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	398x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	174x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	33x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	32x
SSA302G08-GDJEC 2x4GBAsintBench 47%, 787 samples	21x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188