Packard EasyNote LS11HR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote LS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV70_HR
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111024
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 12:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B960
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 114
49% 80 Pts
4-Core 89
8-Core 87.9
12% 88.4 Pts
64-Core 87.3
5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 066E) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
576GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 79 91 94 97 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 92.6
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
54% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 71%
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
353GB free
Firmware: GN003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 65 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 71.4
Write 72.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 66.3
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote LS11HR Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback