Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3V-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3V-A  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 10:31
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770TE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 129
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 404
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 137
Parallax 121
102% 128 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 125
Splatting 106
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 318 177 170 172 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 409
Mixed 344
SusWrite 222
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 50.3
168% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 295
224% 301 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
813GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 97 97 92 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 1.3
Write 51
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 93
26% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27%
Great: 67%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
19GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.1 2.6 3 6.1 6.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Read 8
Write 6.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.7
6% 4.98 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 8%
OEM Ext Hard Disk 2TB
920GB free, PID 0070
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 126 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 117
Write 42
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 124
112% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 9905471-084.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 18.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3V-A Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3V-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback