Today's hottest deals

Asrock H81M-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140702
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 11:09
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 197
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 507
53% 423 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 5.5
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 202 213 198 205 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.2% Very good
Read 245
Write 234
Mixed 215
SusWrite 206
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 39.7
129% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 191
143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98
516GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 215 225 210 212 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
74.7% Very good
Read 244
Write 232
Mixed 232
SusWrite 215
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 43.2
140% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 191
140% 183 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 137%
Kingston SA400S37240G 2TB
351GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 87 88 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 92.8
Write 75.5
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 88.9
52% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 9905471-084.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 29 60 25" 1294 888 DELD070 DELL U2515H
Typical H81M-HG4 Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback