Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 22:46
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 146
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 423
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 73
Parallax 71.2
59% 72.1 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 57.5
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mknssdtr 1TB-3DX 1TB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 367 275 281 280 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 424
Write 220
Mixed 294
SusWrite 273
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 38.5
137% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 228
161% 205 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 101%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
340GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 99.5
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 91.9
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$54
194GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 130 129 128 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 102
SusWrite 126
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
682GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 79.3
Write 71.7
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 76.9
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 51%
HTC Android Phone 4GB
4GB free, PID 0ff9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.3 4.1 4 4 4.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 4.1
10% 8.22 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.6% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $605
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback