Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '19 at 07:53
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 121 56% 89.5 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 207 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D 10,029 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 4.69 Parallax 4.41 2% 3.98 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 3.83 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130 4,476 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 301 305 294 306 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 360 Write 300 Mixed 240 SusWrite 302 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 26.6 99% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 148 134% 206 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 98%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 507GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 397GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 230 233 246 247 246 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.9% Average	Read 262 Write 235 Mixed 221 SusWrite 238 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 18.6 63% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 98.4 DQ Mixed 97.9 74% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 49%
Toshiba Q300 Pro 256GB-$149 1,385 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 115GB free Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 332 337 360 359 327 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 438 Write 328 Mixed 352 SusWrite 339 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 31.1 98% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 252 185% 243 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 10242398 1x4GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 5.9 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	42x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	34x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	34x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,795 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16