Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H370M D3H GSM
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 05:27
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 832
84% 680 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8621) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 17.9
16% 17.4 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 20.1
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 133 138 145 136 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61% Good
Read 243
Write 190
Mixed 192
SusWrite 140
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 35.2
129% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 32.3
34% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61%
Great: 85%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 107GB
70GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 143
Write 10
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 1.8
31% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 187%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 893GB
93GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.4% Poor
Read 77.8
Write 3.2
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 3.6
16% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR26C16S8K2HU416 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 28.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback