Asrock B75M R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B75M R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131220
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '19 at 02:47
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G550-$49 1,902 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 94.6 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 67 51% 71.2 Pts	4-Core 77.7 8-Core 86.6 11% 82.1 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0102) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.88 1% 1.13 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MD04ACA200 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 7.5 2.9 3.6 3.5 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.29% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 30.8 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 6.1 14% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 6.29% Great: 99%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 0GB free Firmware: FP2A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 92.8 Write 124 Mixed 46.4 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA300 3TB-$40 151 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 0GB free Firmware: FP2A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 139 Write 158 Mixed 22.3 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 398% 3 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 101%
Toshiba MD04ACA300 3TB-$40 151 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 0GB free Firmware: FP2A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 143 Write 120 Mixed 47.8 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 315% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 101%
Toshiba MD04ACA300 3TB-$40 151 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 0GB free Firmware: FP2A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 60.1 Write 126 Mixed 37.2 55% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 103% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 101%
Toshiba MG03ACA300 3TB 1,003 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 0GB free Firmware: FL2A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 144 Write 145 Mixed 52.5 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 165% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 94%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 0GB free Firmware: FP2A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 84.1 Write 94.1 Mixed 46 55% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 104%
ELECOM MF-TKU2A 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 6046 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.9 5.3 4.3 5.7 5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.22% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 4.9 7% 7.15 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 9%
ELECOM MF-HSU2 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 6007 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7 7.4 5.9 7.5 7.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.76% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 3.8 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 7 7% 5.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 15% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.76% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG9N-DG 2x4GB 290 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 11.2 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M R2.0 Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M R2.0 - $80

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	50x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	38x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	23x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	11x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
DCLT8GN128S 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 227 samples	5x
99P5471-067.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 47%, 38 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $429

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16