PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120418 |
Uptime | 15.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 10 '21 at 12:49 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
74.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 44 40 39 43 37 MB/s
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
458GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 125 124 123 124 MB/s
|
69.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG9N-DG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 1,523x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 951x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 557x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 310x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 269x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 237x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $581 |