Today's hottest deals

Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 04:41
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$127
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 700
67% 554 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1294 1175 597 599 595 593 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,818
Write 1,600
Mixed 695
SusWrite 809
274% 1,231 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 34.3
145% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 640
451% 572 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 190%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
70GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 309 227 212 198 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 452
Mixed 362
SusWrite 264
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 41.7
154% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 317
238% 318 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 134%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$99
446GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 430 451 327 291 276 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 449
Mixed 304
SusWrite 367
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 37.9
125% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 214
195% 300 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 127 128 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 140
Write 126
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 127
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
840GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 114 117 115 117 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 119
Write 143
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 118
71% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 142 141 142 143 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 144
Write 142
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 140
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 84%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 144 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 151
Write 140
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 141
172% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT16G4D30BET4.C16FD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $879
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback