Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 52.5 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 174 57% 105 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 636 58% 487 Pts	64-Core 1617 100% 1617 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.6% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 143 Parallax 132 103% 134 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 126 Splatting 105 93% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 110%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50 5,775 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 206 210 210 211 209 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 412 Write 403 Mixed 271 SusWrite 212 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 34.6 118% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 277 219% 306 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 6x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 6 of 16 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75% Very good	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 28.8 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	4x

RAM
HMT351U7CFR8A 16x4GBHynixBench 84%, 5 samples	4x
HMT351U7CFR8A 8x4GBHynixBench 85%, 11 samples	2x
36KSF1G72PZ-1 8x8GBMicronBench 89%, 49 samples	2x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59