To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory86 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140207
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 04:39
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 76
2-Core 137
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 521
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 94.2
Reflection 106
Parallax 97.2
77% 99.1 fps
MRender 93.3
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 96.1
78% 95.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-S25M8-512G-S8C 512GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06A7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 86 132 213 103 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 199
Write 308
Mixed 139
SusWrite 134
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 13.9
69% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 6.8
DQ Mixed 6.2
6% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 64%
WD easystore 2624 5TB
743GB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 81 81 83 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 113
Write 91.9
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 81.4
118% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 0.6
334% 3.63 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 8.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
304% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 65%
WD easystore 2648 2TB
111GB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 87 87 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 44.4
Write 51.4
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 88.2
78% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.3
148% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 6x16GB
6 of 16 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback