Panasonic CF-54-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 26% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CF-54-1  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF54-1
Memory4 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150327
Uptime8 Days
Run DateApr 11 '17 at 03:48
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 80%
CPU Throttled 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 103
48% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 157
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 4.81
3% 4.61 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 8
5% 5.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-S25M8-512G-S8C 512GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06A7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 492
Write 366
Mixed 412
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 7.03
62% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 77.8
DQ Mixed 17.6
34% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-YK0 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-54-1 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-54-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback