Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 16:59
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 150 2-Core 299 99% 180 Pts	4-Core 602 8-Core 1,192 106% 897 Pts	64-Core 1,659 103% 1,659 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.38% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 12.6 Parallax 8.78 6% 9.5 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 7.53 Splatting 16.7 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.38% Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 114 Parallax 107 84% 108 fps	MRender 97 Gravity 97.5 Splatting 103 82% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 746GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2062 2252 1167 1154 1142 1159 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	328% Outstanding	Read 2,502 Write 2,315 Mixed 1479 SusWrite 1,489 436% 1,946 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 80.7 264% 91.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,415 DQ Write 1071 DQ Mixed 1,207 912% 1,231 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 328% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 731GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 617 617 615 616 615 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 931GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 132 133 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 157 Write 125 Mixed 118 SusWrite 132 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 3,140 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.8% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 20.6 68% 24 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 22.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,078x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	682x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	311x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	414x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	320x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	267x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,553

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16