bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardCOMMELL LV-67N
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '19 at 13:28
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPU Socket - JIPR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 431
56% 423 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 6.97
3% 5.96 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.04
5% 6.46 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP610 256GB-$100
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0307A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 274 280 281 282 281 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 285
Mixed 279
SusWrite 278
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 40.3
139% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 196
173% 259 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 98%
32gb SATA Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: SFDK001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 30 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 392
Write 61.1
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 26.5
29% 137 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 5
43% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AQ24P72Y8BLK0S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback