| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO E920 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3222-A1 |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150806 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '19 at 21:58 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.8%
Very good
|
76% 132 Pts
|
51% 378 Pts
|
23% 374 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
29% 33.8 fps
|
30% 36.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sata SSD 256GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 133 132 57 55 18 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
52% 235 MB/s
|
31% 14.5 MB/s
|
72% 68 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
41GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 69 64 60 107 52 MB/s
|
94.8%
Outstanding
|
69% 308 MB/s
|
180% 64.3 MB/s
|
262% 356 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
58.1%
Above average
|
58% 20.1 GB/s
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
59% 67.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO E920 Builds (Compare 140 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E920
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 45x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 44x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 70x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $142 |