Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu Celsius W420

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu Celsius W420  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3162-C1
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 17:45
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 96
2-Core 191
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 362
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 31.6
20% 27.5 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 24.1
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN 25SATA01M 060 60GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 91 89 97 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 329
Write 93.2
Mixed 126
SusWrite 92
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 9.6
65% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 95.7
DQ Mixed 55.6
51% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
247GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 90 88 87 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 101
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 82.7
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Celsius W420 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu Celsius W420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback