Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-471

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-471  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA40_HC
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '16 at 13:57
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 104
54% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 156
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 069D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 4.04
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN 25SATA01M 060 60GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150529 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 438
Write 81.3
Mixed 134
47% 218 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 2.49
45% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 11.4
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 15
19% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
611GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 94.1
Write 91.9
Mixed 91.5
119% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-471 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-471

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback