Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory120.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 27 '19 at 15:09
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 63
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
72% 135 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 908
80% 681 Pts
64-Core 2,418
150% 2,418 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 92.3
Parallax 101
65% 91.1 fps
MRender 89.5
Gravity 108
Splatting 131
92% 110 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 296 293 293 291 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 464
Mixed 313
SusWrite 297
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 41.2
137% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 217
194% 293 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$97
289GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 394 398 395 400 396 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 416
Mixed 252
SusWrite 393
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 45.7
136% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 256
196% 266 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$97
148GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 398 403 401 406 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 422
Mixed 253
SusWrite 398
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 31.3
132% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 230
185% 259 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 116%
OCZ VERTEX PLUS 120GB
110GB free
Firmware: 3.50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 151 153 155 155 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 194
Write 163
Mixed 105
SusWrite 154
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 10.1
55% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 48.1
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 11.2
14% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Liteonit LMT-256M6M-HP 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: DM81701
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 365 370 367 373 367 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 374
Mixed 291
SusWrite 362
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 35.8
125% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 216
185% 271 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 88%
Jmicron H/W RAID5 24TB
22TB free
Firmware: 0958
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 236 242 221 238 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 130
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 228
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
340% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 152 155 158 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 101
Mixed 65
SusWrite 155
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
JMicron H/W RAID5 40TB
21.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 231 235 236 239 235 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.8% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 209
Mixed 194
SusWrite 229
287% 208 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
194% 6.3 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 48
142% 49.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 21.6
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 125%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,019
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback