Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory368GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 368GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory134.4 GB free of 368 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '19 at 01:54
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
CPU #000, 12 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 60.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
69% 128 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 856
76% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 238 238 233 240 242 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 506
Write 275
Mixed 338
SusWrite 238
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 13.7
49% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 110
82% 110 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 80%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
377GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 109 109 111 107 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
Read 197
Write 140
Mixed 159
SusWrite 110
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 11.2
26% 8.3 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 219
155% 197 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 537GB
101GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 101 100 91 94 97 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
Read 382
Write 222
Mixed 298
SusWrite 99
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 11.5
32% 9.67 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 209
154% 202 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 65%
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
460GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 240 240 235 238 242 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 543
Write 273
Mixed 366
SusWrite 239
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 13.6
51% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 110
83% 111 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 23x16GB
23 of 128 slots used
368GB DIMM DRAM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 33.3
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback