Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime10 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 17:47
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$98
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 232
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 694
68% 558 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 50.4
44% 55.6 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 70.1
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,787
Write 4,208
Mixed 4,147
977% 4,381 MB/s
4K Read 317
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 128
697% 181 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 600
452% 608 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 5.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 215 225 230 229 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 258
Write 204
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 225
137% 189 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.1
270% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 41.6
124% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 50.6
79% 50.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 111%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback