Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100129
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 16:15
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 42
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 38.3
23% 33.6 Pts
4-Core 60.9
8-Core 76.9
9% 68.9 Pts
64-Core 92.2
6% 92.2 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
XFX(1682 2365) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 1.81
5% 5.25 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.91
5% 6.18 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500YS-18SHB1 250GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.06C04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.5
Write 34.3
Mixed 23
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 36%
Hitachi HDT725025VLAT80 250GB
66GB free
Firmware: V5DOA42A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 29 26 24 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 16.8
Write 30.4
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 25.5
15% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 35%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
121GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.6
Write 39.5
Mixed 31.8
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.59% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-73PVM-S2H Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback