Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 08:22
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$137
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 149
2-Core 284
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,030
97% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,491
92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 78.9
50% 66.6 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 43.4
44% 55 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,522
Write 2,117
Mixed 1,048
419% 1,896 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 79.4
210% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 1,090
782% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
269GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 79 80 77 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 74.9
Write 75
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 78.2
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 30.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,032
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback