MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 17:54
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 959
86% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,313
81% 1,313 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 367B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 69.5
60% 71.6 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 60.4
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 620 623 624 621 621 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,110
Write 1,734
Mixed 814
SusWrite 665
296% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 63.7
243% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 882
695% 964 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 244%
Great: 254%
Amd-raid Array 2 960GB
273GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 324 261 311 318 309 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 410
Write 525
Mixed 366
SusWrite 316
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 21.3
68% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 91
104% 172 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 88%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 380 379 347 383 382 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
203% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 309
Mixed 151
SusWrite 364
213% 292 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
214% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 203%
Great: 203%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
59GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 23 23 20 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
23% Poor
Read 92.5
Write 29.7
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 23.1
67% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.5
142% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23%
Great: 43%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
60GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 22 22 20 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 92.5
Write 48.8
Mixed 56
SusWrite 22.6
66% 55 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 3
146% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 33.7
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 29.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 108%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback