Today's hottest deals

Dell Inspiron 3647

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Inspiron 3647  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 02YRK5
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime6 Days
Run DateAug 08 '16 at 20:13
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 160
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 284
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 0611) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 4.41
3% 4.42 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 172
Mixed 173
131% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.17
88% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 112%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB
35GB free, PID 00d5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 108
Write 79.5
Mixed 54.1
95% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.47
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 3647 Builds (Compare 1,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 3647

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback