Acer Veriton M6610G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M6610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6610G
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 22:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 25,375,954 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 184
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 353
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 36.2
31% 34.7 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 34.9
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
154GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 93 90 90 91 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 475
Write 442
Mixed 340
SusWrite 144
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 29.2
102% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 179
178% 283 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 455
Mixed 436
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 41.4
132% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-AE-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-AE-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M6610G Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M6610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback