ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Predator PH517-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Cayman_CFS
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181024
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '19 at 13:57
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 250 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 628 70% 551 Pts	64-Core 761 47% 761 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Lighting 99.4 Reflection 122 Parallax 103 81% 108 fps	MRender 95.9 Gravity 96.9 Splatting 101 81% 98 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GB 1,347 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 40000E00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 707 667 649 658 663 637 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,606 Write 807 Mixed 760 SusWrite 664 212% 959 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 53 184% 64.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,004 DQ Write 579 DQ Mixed 507 454% 697 MB/s
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 225%
WDC WD10SPZX-21Z10T0 960GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 585GB free Firmware: P0510G1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 434 440 448 450 142 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 503 Write 457 Mixed 354 SusWrite 391 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 47.2 158% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 237 197% 281 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 85%
Lacie 2big v2 THB USB3 8TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 304 303 306 306 306 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.9% Below average	Read 305 Write 293 Mixed 128 SusWrite 303 58% 257 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 2.8 17% 5.97 MB/s	DQ Read 6.9 DQ Write 10.2 DQ Mixed 3.3 4% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 32GB 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.8% Excellent	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 25.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 32.8 SC Mixed 25.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	430x
Core i9-8950HKIntelBench 74%, 14,729 samples	153x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	584x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x

SSD
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GBBench 190%, 1,347 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	40x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	39x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	131x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	110x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback