Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 20:26
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 137
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 469
43% 360 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 47 42 45 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.4% Below average
Read 269
Write 45.9
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 46.9
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 9.7
51% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 28.7
DQ Mixed 32.1
49% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 73%
LSI MR9260-8i 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 25 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
Read 385
Write 23.9
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 24.6
26% 123 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
9% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback