Today's hottest deals

Asus Rampage III Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Formula  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '19 at 03:15
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 237
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 766
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1647 MHz, MLim: 1110 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 187
100% 134 fps
MRender 89.6
Gravity 142
Splatting 128
99% 120 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S 700 250GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 115 66 43 45 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 364
Write 116
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 86.3
31% 144 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 48.7
82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III Formula Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback