bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 573 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5115
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 52.9
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 75.4
42% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 208
27% 206 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD MxGPU
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.13028.22
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
9.01% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 15
9% 11.7 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 12.9
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.01%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 110GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
Read 84.9
Write 35.4
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 16
30% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 30.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback