Asus ESC4000 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ESC4000 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z11PG-D16 Series
Memory43.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 16:29
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6126
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 227
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 860
77% 650 Pts
64-Core 3,356
208% 3,356 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
PNY(196E 12AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 233
Parallax 220
167% 219 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 212
Splatting 127
158% 203 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 151%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2015 1981 2054 1913 1913 1914 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,145
Write 1,902
Mixed 1328
SusWrite 1,965
412% 1835 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 66.8
237% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 1,041
DQ Mixed 1090
828% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 329%
Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1 12x4GB
12 of 16 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
128% Outstanding
MC Read 47.9
MC Write 68.5
MC Mixed 45.3
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback