HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory248.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 20:55
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6126
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 44.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
62% 118 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 801
70% 595 Pts
64-Core 3,120
193% 3,120 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Dell(1028 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 49.5
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 48.3
40% 50.3 fps
MRender 47.9
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 56.5
43% 51.5 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0615
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 314
Write 93.8
Mixed 93.9
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 10.4
49% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 102%
ASolid USB 16GB
14GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 23.4
Mixed 13.2
45% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
96% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 16x16GB
16 of 24 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 28.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback