IBM 00Y8494

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIBM 00Y8494  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 72 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130531
Uptime120.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 19:13
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 44.2
1-Core 52
2-Core 114
39% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 413
37% 314 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 1TB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 293 348 314 296 320 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
Read 431
Write 401
Mixed 111
SusWrite 316
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.7
11% 4.67 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 13.8
11% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 168%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 2.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 76 77 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
190% Outstanding
Read 582
Write 66
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 76.2
150% 206 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
974% 7.07 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4A-H9 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4A-H9 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4A-H9 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4A-H9 72GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 00Y8494 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: IBM 00Y8494

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback